tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-745748859173296736.post4777234169474453328..comments2023-04-11T09:34:03.031-04:00Comments on Polybloggimous: What to Write AboutNathanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00648438549121320566noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-745748859173296736.post-42447555495377079282008-01-31T00:04:00.000-05:002008-01-31T00:04:00.000-05:00Well I'm pretty attached to both G's, but now you'...Well I'm pretty attached to both G's, but now you're telling me there are rules?Nathanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00648438549121320566noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-745748859173296736.post-31944091323809520982008-01-30T23:43:00.000-05:002008-01-30T23:43:00.000-05:00Sorry I'm late on this. You can breathe out now.Tw...Sorry I'm late on this. You can breathe out now.<BR/><BR/>Two "g"s, G. Because grammar demands one "g" followed by "i" be pronounced soft, as in "poly-blodg-imous" and that just sounds, um, stupid.Jeff Hentoszhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05060570930866182531noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-745748859173296736.post-35502676568042332112008-01-29T14:34:00.000-05:002008-01-29T14:34:00.000-05:00Now that I've seen it with two g's for a while, it...Now that I've seen it with two g's for a while, it looks right that way. So leave it alone!<BR/><BR/>*ambles over to Jeri's to see her thoughts on the address*MWThttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09446603415730525882noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-745748859173296736.post-35954651247570153572008-01-29T11:36:00.000-05:002008-01-29T11:36:00.000-05:00WEll Jeri, that's just plain selfish.WEll Jeri, that's just plain selfish.Nathanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00648438549121320566noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-745748859173296736.post-74241970521087302992008-01-29T11:28:00.000-05:002008-01-29T11:28:00.000-05:00Two Gs. Looks better that way.PolybloggimousPolyb...Two Gs. Looks better that way.<BR/><BR/>Polybloggimous<BR/>Polyblogimous<BR/><BR/>Yeah, two. And I'm also lazy about my blogroll.<BR/><BR/>I have some thoughts - less analytical than cultural - on the state of the union address. As I hit the third paragraph, I realized I should probably blog it myself. So I deleted that part, and you're left with this. ;)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-745748859173296736.post-19240397926613665742008-01-29T10:37:00.000-05:002008-01-29T10:37:00.000-05:00Yeah, two. What are you thinking man? ;)Yeah, two. What are you <I>thinking</I> man? ;)Shawn Powershttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15186686711412505957noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-745748859173296736.post-33755602530273960452008-01-29T10:24:00.000-05:002008-01-29T10:24:00.000-05:00Two, because I have the link on my blog that way. ...Two, because I have the link on my blog that way. And I'm, you know, <EM>lazy.</EM>Janiecehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14190655869710465713noreply@blogger.com